Archive

Old systems still contain evidence.

This is not a graveyard of abandoned repositories. It is a place to reconstruct what actually happened: what ran, what failed, what was superseded, and what still contains useful ideas.

Recovered timeline

A working chronology built from surviving repositories, documentation, deployment traces, and project relationships.

Aug 2024

GitHub Pages site begins

The repository that now hosts this site was created while a broader API and self-hosted environment was taking shape.

Feb 2025

jc-web-api becomes visible

The site documented a FastAPI backend with auth, WebSockets, MariaDB, monitoring, Docker and MicroK8s, along with live API and documentation endpoints.

Spring 2025

AI moves from helper to system client

A custom GPT called App Architect and Coder was configured to invoke the backend, making the model an interface into infrastructure you controlled.

Apr–May 2025

Frontend and AI layers converge

Sentient Proxy explicitly referenced both jc-web-api and the broader Sentient AI system, revealing that several repositories were parts of one expanding architecture rather than isolated experiments.

2026

Reconstruction

The goal now is not to resume everything. It is to identify the real objective behind each artifact and decide what deserves preservation, extension, or closure.

Archive rules

A project only becomes useful history if its state is described accurately.

Evidence

Execution beats intention

Logs, commits, deployments, API calls and observed behavior carry more weight than plans or generated documentation.

Context

Preserve the objective

The repository name may change while the underlying problem remains the same. The objective matters more than the tool.

Boundary

Not everything needs revival

A completed learning experiment can stay complete. Recovering history does not obligate restarting it.